Jesus Teaches in the Temple

A spiritual kingdom

When Jesus entered Jerusalem in kingly style, riding on a colt, the people believed that He was about to reign as their king. Therefore, quoting ancient prophesy, they shouted with joy, “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord” (Luke 19:38).

They were not mistaken about the fact that Jesus was coming as their king. They were, however, mistaken about what kind of a king He would be. They believed that He would be a worldly king who would sit on a throne, deliver the people from their oppressors, and restore Israel to the glory that it had under the rule of King David. This would be the fulfillment of the promise given to David a thousand years earlier about the coming of the Messiah. As it is written in the Hebrew scriptures, “He will reign on the throne of David and over his kingdom forevermore” (Isaiah 9:7).

In the light of this prophecy, it was widely believed that Jesus was “the son of David,” the long-awaited Messiah who was about to establish His kingdom. The people did not yet understand that Jesus’ kingdom would be a spiritual kingdom, not a worldly one. As Jesus had already said earlier in this gospel, “the kingdom of God is within you” (Luke 17:21). They would soon discover that Jesus did not come to help them conquer their natural enemies or to promote their economic prosperity. As the Messiah, Jesus came to establish the kingdom of God — a spiritual kingdom that would endure forever. ¹

Just as a worldly ruler governs by means of civil law, God governs by means of spiritual law. Therefore, when Jesus comes into Jerusalem, He does not sit on a physical throne. Instead, He goes directly to the temple where He casts out the buyers and sellers before He begins to teach. This represents the spiritual law that falsity must first be removed before truth can be received. The “buyers and sellers” who are cast out represent those states in us that make worldly success more important than heavenly blessings. They make profit, fame, and worldly pleasures more important than loving God and serving the neighbor. ²

Jesus then gives a series of lessons in the temple, beginning with the words, “It is written. ‘My house is a house of prayer, but you have made it a den of thieves’” (Luke 19:46). When our minds are cluttered with false teachings, we are being robbed of the opportunity to learn spiritual truth and develop a deeper understanding. This first lesson in the temple, then, reminds us that a major emphasis in the Gospel According to Luke is the development of the understanding. The understanding is “the temple of God” within us. When this temple is filled with God’s truth, it is a “holy temple” and a “house of prayer.” As we mentioned earlier, people who think from truth, with love in their heart, are continually at prayer. ³

The next two chapters in the Gospel According to Luke take place in the temple. Most scholars agree that Jesus’ teaching in the temple began on Monday or Tuesday of “holy week,” just a few days before His crucifixion on Friday and His resurrection on Sunday. During this final week, Jesus spends the first few days in the temple, teaching the laws of the spiritual kingdom. In so doing, He demonstrates not only that He is the promised Messiah, but also that He has come to set up a spiritual kingdom, not a natural one.

The Religious Leaders Challenge Jesus’ Authority

1. And it came to pass on one of those days, as He taught the people in the temple, and brought good tidings, the chief priests and the scribes stood by with the elders,

2. And spoke to Him, saying, Tell us, by what authority doest Thou these things, or who is he that gave Thee this authority?

3. And He answered and said to them, I will also ask you one word, and answer Me:

4. The baptism of John, was [it] from heaven, or from men?

5. And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we say, From heaven, He will say, Why then did you not believe him?

6. But if we say, From men, all the people will stone us; for they are persuaded that John was a prophet.

7. And they answered that they knew not whence [it was].

8. And Jesus told them, Neither do’ I say to you by what authority I do these things.

At the end of the previous chapter, Jesus was in the temple, clearing out the buyers and sellers. As this next chapter begins, Jesus is still there. As it is written, “Now it happened on one of those days as He taught the people in the temple and preached the gospel, that the chief priests and the scribes, together with the elders, confronted Him” (Luke 20:1). Even though Jesus has momentarily “cleansed the temple,” troublemakers are back again to defy His authority. These are the “chief priests, scribes, and elders” within us who refuse to let go of false beliefs and selfish desires. We may subdue them for a while, but if we take our attention away from the things of heaven, these selfish desires, along with the false beliefs that support them, will be back to raise doubts so that they can reassert control over our lives. ⁴

One of the first things they will do is question Jesus’ authority. This is illustrated in the next episode when the religious leaders approach Jesus and say, “By what authority are You doing these things? Who gave You this authority?” (Luke 20:2). The question of authority is an important one. The temple leaders, and especially the chief priests, were a select group of people. They were direct descendants from the tribe of Levi, and they were thoroughly trained for their position. By the commonly accepted standards of the day, they were the only people who were fully authorized to give religious instruction. In brief, they were saying to Jesus, “Just who do You think You are? Where are Your credentials? And who has given You the authority to preach in our temple?”

This moment of confrontation pictures those times when doubts arise in our mind about Jesus’ teachings and their authority in our lives. This is when the “chief priests and scribes” in us rise up and insinuate thoughts such as, “How can I be sure that Jesus’ teachings are true?” This is our old nature raising doubts about the truth. It’s a very old story. When new truth comes into our lives, it can be upsetting to our former beliefs, especially when those beliefs support our selfish interests. Therefore, we doubt. We resist. Our selfish nature refuses to allow this new “government” to reign over us.

This new government that Jesus comes to inaugurate is a kingdom of love, wisdom, and useful service. It is a kingdom whose laws can be known through a deeper understanding of God’s Word. Not everyone, however, is ready to say, “Thy kingdom come.” For example, when Jesus came to reveal this deeper meaning to the people, the religious leaders saw it not as a revelation about a new way to live, but rather as a threat to their authority. In brief, Jesus was challenging their interpretation of the scriptures. That’s why they confronted Him, saying, “Who gives you the authority to do this?”

Moreover, it was not just the religious leaders who were challenged by Jesus’ words and deeper interpretation of scripture. This was also a challenge for everyone who took the scriptures literally, expecting a worldly king to save their nation, make them a world power, and restore prosperity. After all, it had been prophesied in the scriptures that when the Messiah comes, “He shall rule in the midst of His enemies…. He shall crush the rulers of the whole earth” (Psalms 110:2, 6), and “He shall make them prosperous again” (Psalms 14:7).

It is understandable, then, that the people are confused, and the religious leaders are threatened. Jesus is teaching a different way of life. In a culture that was steeped in the idea of “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” (Leviticus 24:20), Jesus was teaching that we must not take vengeance upon our enemies. Rather, we must turn away from evil states within ourselves — our spiritual enemies.

At this point in the gospel narrative, many have been healed by Jesus or have witnessed His healings. Many have witnessed Jesus’ miracles or heard about them. And multitudes have come to hear Jesus teach and marveled at His wisdom. They know that there is something special about Jesus and they believe that He is the promised Messiah. But the message of this Messiah is not about world conquest, national glory, or material prosperity. Rather, it’s about faith in God, loving one’s neighbor, and forgiving one’s enemies.

In order to understand, accept, and live by the new truths that Jesus is teaching, the people will need to let go of old beliefs and habitual patterns. It’s never easy, especially when our selfish side resists. No wonder the religious leaders felt threatened by Jesus and questioned His authority.

The baptism of John

Admittedly, letting go of acquired beliefs and entrenched habits can be a difficult process. When the scriptures contradict our false beliefs and selfish desires a struggle ensues. Doubts arise about the authority of the Word. As we have mentioned, this is represented by the religious leaders who question Jesus’ authority. Momentarily setting aside their challenge to His authority, Jesus shifts the focus to a question about John’s right to baptize people. “Answer Me,” says Jesus. “The baptism of John — was it from heaven or from men?” (Luke 20:3).

The question of baptism is an important one. Even today, two thousand years later, people still wonder about baptism. They ask, “Is baptism a sacrament designed by God for the washing away of sin? Or is it merely an external act invented by men?” In other words, “Is it from heaven or from men.” Stumped by Jesus’ question, they refuse to respond. They know that if they say that John’s authority is from heaven, Jesus will say, ‘Why, then, did you not believe him?’ But if they say, “From men,” the people will oppose them, for the people believe that John is a prophet (Luke 20:6). Caught between their resentment of John the Baptist and their fear of public disapproval, the religious leaders cannot give a decisive reply. Instead, they answer that they do not know the origin of John’s authority (Luke 20:7).

As we have mentioned before, John the Baptist signifies the literal sense of the Word. Once this signification is established, Jesus’ question takes on increased significance. At the literal level, baptism by water represents a willingness to learn the introductory truths of religion. Baptism at this level is a response to the question, “Do you desire to be instructed in the literal truths of the Word?” More deeply, the question about baptism might be formulated in this manner: “Do you believe that despite its rough appearance, symbolized by John being clothed in camel’s hair, the literal sense of the Word is from heaven and therefore has authority?”

An affirmative response to this question indicates that the individual believes that the Word of God is holy, both in its letter and in its spirit, and therefore desires to be instructed in the truths that are contained in the scriptures, beginning with the literal teachings. This is the “water” of truth, which is also called “the baptism of John.” To the extent that people learn these truths and put them into their lives, their spirits are made “clean,” just as physical water washes away dirt. ⁵

Therefore, when Jesus asks about the baptism of John, He is raising a question about the authority of the literal sense of the Word. The question that He is putting before the religious leaders, and before each of us, is this: “Are the literal words of sacred scripture from heaven or from men?” Do we believe that the scriptures are man-made or God-breathed? ⁶

This is an important question. It is true that there are things in the literal sense of the Word that are difficult to understand. Sometimes it says that the Lord is full of “tender mercies” (Psalms 145:9) and at other times it says that God will “utterly destroy” the nations (Isaiah 34:2). But if we hold on to the idea that the literal sense is from heaven, and can be understood more deeply, it can become authoritative for us. Those literal teachings of scripture, like John the Baptist, “prepare the way” for the coming of deeper truth into our life. They prepare the way for Jesus to enter our inner Jerusalem, and then go into the temple of our minds where He first casts out false beliefs, and then teaches us the truths of His Word. It can be said, in fact, that those literal truths, even when they seem to be “man-made,” are far from it. They are from heaven and they contain the inner meaning of the Word, clothed in parable and symbol. ⁷

A practical application

When we believe that the literal sense of the Word is holy because it contains heavenly truths, it can have a powerful influence on our lives. In this regard, it becomes authoritative. As a spiritual practice, then, keep in mind that the literal words of scripture contain infinite depths of truth. When you read the literal sense of scripture in the light of its inner meaning, you will be allowing the Lord to speak to you through both the letter and spirit of His Word. To put it another way, you will be receiving the power of the literal sense and the glory of the internal sense simultaneously. This is how the Lord speaks to you, authoritatively, through His Word.

The Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers

9. And He began to say to the people this parable: A certain man planted a vineyard, and let it out to farmers, and went abroad for a considerable time.

10. And at the time, he sent a servant to the farmers, that they should give him [some] of the fruit of the vineyard; but the farmers beat him, and sent [him] away empty.

11. And again he sent another servant; and they beat him also, and treating [him] shamefully, they sent [him] away empty.

12. And he added to send a third; and they also wounded him, and cast [him] out.

13. And the lord of the vineyard said, What shall I do? I will send my beloved son; likely when they see him they will have respect for [him].

14. But when the farmers saw him, they reasoned to themselves, saying, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may become ours.

15. And they cast him out of the vineyard, and killed [him]. What therefore shall the lord of the vineyard do to them?

16. He shall come, and shall destroy these farmers, and shall give the vineyard to others. And when they heard, they said, Let it not be so.

17. And He looked at them and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same has become the head of the corner?

18. Everyone who falls upon that stone shall be broken; but on whomever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

19. And the chief priests and scribes sought to put [their] hands on Him in that same hour; and they feared the people, for they knew that He had spoken this parable towards them.

In contrast to the people who were “very attentive to hear Him” (Luke 19:48), the temple leaders are eager to demean and discredit Jesus, challenging His authority. Undeterred by the negative attitude of these religious leaders, Jesus begins to instruct them in a different way. Once again, He uses the method of the parable, allowing them to overhear what He says to the people.

The parable begins in a seemingly indirect manner. It’s about a man who planted a vineyard, leased it to vinedressers, and then went into a far country where he stayed for a long time (Luke 20:9). When harvest time comes, the owner of the vineyard sends one of his servants to collect some of the fruit of the vineyard. But instead of giving the servant some of the fruit, they beat the servant and send him away with nothing (Luke 20:10). A second servant and then a third servant are sent to collect some fruit, but they are treated similarly. Finally, the owner of the vineyard sends his “beloved son,” saying, “When they see him, they will have respect for him” (Luke 20:13).

Knowing that the religious leaders are plotting to kill Him, Jesus then describes what happens to the beloved son. Jesus says, “But when the vinedressers saw him, they reasoned to themselves, saying, ‘This is the heir; come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may become ours’” (Luke 20:15). As Jesus concludes the parable, He asks a significant question: “Therefore,” says Jesus, “what will the owner of the vineyard do to them?” (Luke 20:15).

Vaguely disguised in the language of parable, it is now evident that Jesus’ words are directed at the temple leaders. The question, “What will the owner of the vineyard do to the vinedressers who killed the owner’s beloved son?” is actually, “What will God do to the religious leaders who are plotting to murder Jesus?” God has given the religious leaders the opportunity to do great good. The truths of His Word are a beautiful spiritual vineyard. What have the religious leaders done with those truths? Do they have any fruit? Have they produced any goodness? What can they show for their efforts?

Sadly, the religious leaders have nothing to give. The Hebrew scriptures record how the ancestors of these religious leaders beat the prophets that were sent to them. For example, the prophet Elijah had said to the Lord, “The Israelites have rejected your covenant, torn down your altars, and put your prophets to death with the sword. I am the only one left, and now they are trying to kill me” (1 Kings 19:10). In the parable, this is represented by the way the wicked vinedressers brutally treated the first three servants that were sent to them. And now, they are planning to murder the owner’s beloved son. The parable is a warning to the religious leaders. Jesus is telling them that their punishment will be severe. As Jesus puts it, the owner of the vineyard will “come and destroy the vinedressers and give the vineyard to others” (Luke 20:16).

Jesus knows how corrupt the religious leaders have become. He knows they are deaf to the warnings of the prophets. Just as they refused to listen to John the Baptist, they refuse to listen to Jesus. Instead, they are determined to kill Him. Although they have been given ample opportunity to repent and reform, they have refused. Neither the voice of the prophets, nor the voice of the scriptures, nor the voice of Jesus can get through to them. Therefore, their time is up. Their tenure will shortly end, and they will be replaced by something new. Jesus will inaugurate a new kind of faith for those willing to be raised up into a higher level of understanding and willing to live a more loving way of life. These people will become the new vinedressers. As it is written, “the vineyard will be given to others” (Luke 20:16). ⁸

This is good news for us. It means that there is always hope. We can repent; we can pray; we can allow the Lord to reform our understanding; and we can begin again. When this happens, we will no longer be ruled by the corrupt religious leaders within us. These are the false beliefs that have led us astray and produced so much misery. They have rejected the prophets and tried to kill the Lord. But they will no longer be allowed to have their say. They will be removed, set to the side, and silenced. In the language of sacred scripture, this is what is contained within the literal warning that the owner is about to come and “destroy” those wicked vinedressers. All that is selfish and corrupt in ourselves will no longer determine what is true. Instead, the Lord’s vineyard will be under new management. The Lord’s vineyard will be given to those parts of ourselves that are willing to be led by the Lord.

This, however, is not what the religious leaders hear. They see that the parable is about them and they hear it as a stern warning to repent before God destroys them and gives the vineyard to others. But they refuse to believe it. Instead, they deny that their leadership is corrupt or that God will remove them and have new leaders take their place. Therefore, they cry out, “Surely not” (Luke 20:16), meaning that this will never happen. Once again, they refuse to believe Jesus.

The stone that the builders rejected

Up until this point, Jesus has been speaking to the people, knowing, full well, that the religious leaders are listening. When the religious leaders realize that the parable is about them, they vehemently reject it. Jesus takes advantage of this rejection, and uses it to remind them that His coming and His rejection were prophesied in the psalms of David. As Jesus puts it, “The stone that the builders rejected has become the head of the corner” (Luke 20:17; Psalms 118:22). In recalling this prophecy, Jesus is openly declaring that the divine truth He has come to teach is the stone that the religious leaders have been rejecting. Moreover, Jesus is saying that these truths will be the foundation for an entirely new religious system, with faith in Him as the cornerstone. ⁹

After declaring Himself to be the cornerstone of this new faith, Jesus adds this warning: “Whoever falls on that stone will be broken; but on whomever it falls, it will grind him to powder” (Luke 20:18). Through these words, Jesus is once again recalling the warnings given through the prophets about the dangers associated with rejecting the Messiah. As it is written, “[The Messiah] will be a sanctuary [for some], but a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense [for others]. Many shall stumble. They shall fall and be broken” (Isaiah 8:14-15). And when asked to interpret King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, the prophet Daniel says that a stone will “crush to powder” the great image the king saw in his dream (Daniel 2:31-35).

Indeed, the Word of God is a sanctuary for those who have ears to hear, and a rock of offense to those who refuse to listen. In fact, the more anyone relies on the Word, finding sanctuary in its truth, the stronger one’s faith becomes. People who choose to deny the Lord and the truth that He offers might still feel that they are strong and mighty. Eventually, however, the persistent denial of spiritual truth will leave them weak and powerless, broken and crushed. ¹⁰

Taken together, both the parable and Jesus’ reminder that they will be “broken” and “crushed to powder” are too much for the religious leaders. They are now more determined than ever to destroy Jesus — just as Jesus foretold in the parable. As it is written in the closing verse of this episode: “And the chief priests and the scribes that very hour sought to lay hands on Him, but they feared the people — for they knew He had spoken this parable against them” (Luke 20:18).

Is it Lawful to Pay Taxes to Caesar?

20. And watching [Him] closely, they sent out spies, feigning themselves to be just, that they might take hold of His word, to deliver Him up to the rule and authority of the governor.

21. And they asked Him, saying, Teacher, we know that Thou sayest and teachest rightly, and receivest not [merely] the face, but teachest the way of God in truth.

22. Is it permitted for us to give tribute to Caesar, or not?

23. But He, considering their craftiness, said to them, Why do you tempt Me?

24. Show Me a denarius. Whose image and inscription has it? And answering they said, Caesar’s.

25. And He said to them, Render therefore the [things] of Caesar unto Caesar, and the [things] of God unto God.

26. And they were not able to take [hold] of His saying before the people, and marveling at His answer, they were silent.

When Jesus completed the parable about the wicked vinedressers, the religious leaders knew it was about them. Offended and angry, they wanted to lay their hands on Jesus immediately, but because they were aware of Jesus’ growing popularity among the people, they drew back. As it is written, “they feared the people” (Luke 20:19). Therefore, instead of confronting Jesus themselves, they decided to send out spies who would seize upon Jesus’ words “in order to deliver Him to the power and the authority of the governor” (Luke 20:20).

Once again, the religious leaders are trying to trap Jesus in a controversial question. Jesus’ answer to the question will either make Him unpopular among the people or prove that He is a dangerous radical determined to defy the Roman government. In other words, they were endeavoring to trap Jesus in a dilemma where there would be no right answer.

The trap begins when the spies approach Jesus and ask a seemingly innocent question. “Teacher,” they say, “Is it lawful for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not” (Luke 20:22). The subject of paying taxes to Caesar is a sensitive issue among the people. Many feel that paying taxes to Caesar, the reigning king, is a crime against God. The rallying cry for this group is, “We have no king, but God.” These are the people who champion a fierce independence, even to the point of armed revolution. Therefore, if Jesus suggests that they should not pay taxes, His words will be construed as defying the government, and the Roman officials will be able to arrest Him for treason. This will be playing directly into the hands of the religious leaders. This question, then, is designed to trap Jesus between two extremes: disloyalty to the people or treason against the state. Either way, Jesus will be in trouble.

Knowing the nature of their question, Jesus says, “Why do you test Me? Show Me a denarius. Whose image and inscription does it have?” (Luke 20:23). The spies give a simple answer. They say that the image on the Roman coin is “Caesar’s.” (Luke 20:24). In reply, Jesus says, “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Luke 20:25).

Jesus’ response not only avoids the trap, but uses this as an opportunity to teach that true spirituality is not separate from daily life. While God’s rule should always be first and foremost in our minds, we should also obey the rule of legitimate government. In the same way that the preservation of our spiritual lives depends upon a life according to divine order, the preservation of our natural lives depends upon there being civil order. Without civil order, society would fall apart, and the human race could not survive. We need both spiritual law and civil law. ¹¹

Ideally, spiritual law and civil law should work in harmony. The laws of spiritual government should be consistent with the laws of civil government. When this is not the case, problems arise. A tyrannical, despotic government that makes laws that are injurious to the welfare of the people should, of course, be resisted. Similarly, a focus on religious devotion to the exclusion of civil responsibilities can also be a problem. We cannot love God without also loving our neighbor. The clever rationalizations of the “spies” within us, who pretend to be righteous, will often lead us to believe we have done our whole duty by fulfilling our religious obligations. These are the times when it is essential to remember the brevity and power of Jesus’ reply, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and unto God what is God’s.” ¹²

Unable to trick Jesus with this second question, the spies are left speechless. As it is written at the close of this episode, “Marveling at His answer, they were silent” (Luke 20:26).

A practical application

In His response to the question about paying taxes, Jesus reminds us that our duties are two-fold. There are two sides to the coin. On one side, is a picture of God. That is, we are to render to God what is God’s. On the other side is a picture of our neighbor whom we should love as ourself. This includes doing our jobs well, treating all people with respect, and even paying our taxes willingly, knowing that it is for the benefit of the public good. That is, we should not only render unto God what is God’s, but also render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. ¹³

Is There Resurrection After Death?

27. But certain of the Sadducees, who deny that there is any resurrection, came to [Him] and asked Him,

28. Saying, Teacher, Moses wrote to us, If someone’s brother die having a wife, and he die childless, then his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed to his brother.

29. There were therefore seven brothers, and the first took a wife, and died childless.

30. And the second took the wife, and he died childless.

31. And the third took her, and likewise the seven also, and they left no children, and died.

32. And last of all the woman died also.

33. In the resurrection therefore, whose wife of them is she? for the seven had her to wife.

34. And Jesus answering said to them, The sons of this age wed and are given to be wed;

35. But they who shall be held worthy to attain to that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither wed, nor are given to be wed;

36. For they cannot die any more; for they are equal to the angels, and are the sons of God, being sons of the resurrection.

37. But that the dead are raised, even Moses showed at the bramble, when he calls the Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob;

38. And He is not God of the dead, but of the living, for all live to Him.

39. And some of the scribes answering, said, Teacher, Thou hast well said.

40. And after that they no longer dared to question Him [about] anything

Arranged marriages

The next group of religious leaders who endeavor to trap Jesus with a controversial question is the Sadducees. This time it is a question about the resurrection. It was well-known that this religious group did not believe that there was any life after death. As it is written, “Certain of the Sadducees, who deny that there is any resurrection, came to Him” (Luke 20:27). The Sadducees regarded only the first five books of the Hebrew scriptures as having divine authority. In these books they found no suggestion that human beings live after death. Therefore, when they come to Jesus with a question about the resurrection, it is another question designed to discredit Jesus. Their question would show that Jesus’ lofty teachings about heaven and dire warnings about hell are false. After all, according to the Sadducees, there is no afterlife.

In order to prove how foolish it is to believe in life after death, the Sadducees describe a situation in which seven brothers in succession all take the same wife. The first brother dies, leaving no children; then the second brother dies, leaving no children, and so on until all seven have married the woman and then die, leaving no children. The Sadducees then ask Jesus this question: “In the resurrection whose wife will she become?” (Luke 20:33).

According to the Sadducees, the only possible continuation of life was in the passing on of the family name along with any wealth that the family possessed. This was so important that laws were in place stipulating that if a man died, his brother should marry his brother’s widow and have children by her. Otherwise, the family name would be “blotted out.” As it is written in the Hebrew scriptures, “If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside of the family; her husband’s brother shall go in to her, to take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her. And it shall be that the firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel” (Deuteronomy 25:5-6).

Therefore, in order to preserve the family name and to ensure that the family property would not fall into the hands of strangers, the woman was “given in marriage” to all seven brothers. There are many examples of this in the Hebrew scriptures. Zipporah was given in marriage to Moses (Exodus 2:21); Rebecca was given in marriage to Isaac (Genesis 24:51); and both Leah and Rachel were given in marriage to Jacob (Genesis 29:19,28). In each case, a father had the right of ownership over his daughter. It was by his authority and with his permission that his daughter was “given in marriage.” Similarly, the woman in the story was “given” from one brother to another until “all seven had her” (Luke 20:33). Their far-fetched story is intended to make the idea of a resurrection seem to be an absurdity. They believe that their concluding question, “In the resurrection, whose wife does she become?” will clinch their argument. It will conclusively prove the irrationality of a belief in an afterlife.

Heavenly marriage

Jesus knows that the question of the Sadducees is designed to discredit His teachings about the afterlife. Nevertheless, Jesus turns their question into an opportunity to teach about the eternity of the marriage covenant. Jesus begins by saying, “The sons of this age marry and are given in marriage, but those who are counted worthy to attain that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage; nor can they die anymore, for they are equal to the angels and are the sons of God, being sons of the resurrection” (Luke 20:34-36).

Jesus’ answer to the question is clear and straightforward. He says that there is resurrection after death. And He backs this up by reminding the Sadducees that in the burning bush passage, Moses showed that the dead are raised. Jesus then adds that those who are resurrected neither marry nor are given in marriage. We have already seen that the kind of marriages the Sadducees are speaking about are worldly arrangements for the preservation of the family name and the inheritance of the family fortune. It had little to do with love, or God, or the commandments. These worldly marriages, like all civil unions, end at death. Therefore, when Jesus says that in the resurrection they “neither marry nor are given in marriage,” He is saying that the kind of marriage the Sadducees are talking about, where a woman is given to a man for worldly reasons and without her consent, does not take place in heaven.

At a deeper level, Jesus is talking about the spiritual marriage that takes place between every individual and the Lord. It is a conjunction that takes place on earth when people freely choose to let the Lord into their life and strive to live by His teachings. This marriage, which begins on earth, continues after death. Once we are spiritually “married to the Lord” on earth, there is no reason to be married to the Lord again in heaven. ¹⁴

Jesus’ answer to the Sadducees, then, is not about arranged marriages that take place merely for worldly purposes. Jesus is talking about spiritual marriages, and especially about the heavenly marriage that takes place between an individual and the Lord. ¹⁵

What about a marriage between two people? Does it continue in heaven?

Many people marry for practical reasons. They may find that a marriage arrangement works for them. It satisfies their need for security, significance, sex, communication, and friendship. They may get along fine and even share common interests, for example in sports, diet, and music. They may agree on methods of child-rearing. All of this can be useful, but if their relationship lacks a spiritual dimension, it will be no more than a civil contract. And, like all legal partnerships, it will end at death.

It is different, however, when husband and wife come together before the Lord believing not only that the Lord has brought them together but that He will keep them together both in this world, and in the next. These people often feel that there is something spiritual about their meeting, that they are “meant to be together,” that they are “born for each other,” that their marriage is “bigger than both of them,” and that their marriage is “forever.” Somehow, they sense that their love will transcend time, and that the words “till death do you part” do not apply to their relationship. This idea, that there is a spiritual dimension to marriage, has inspired romantic poetry, music, and art because it is grounded in a fundamental truth: true marriage is eternal. ¹⁶

But simply believing that some magical force has brought them together and will keep them together is not enough. They must also accept the divine invitation to follow the Lord in this life, to love Him, and live according to His commandments. In return, the Lord fills them with goodness, according to the truth they learn from Him and apply to their lives. As a result, they find that they are protected from spiritual harm, blessed with inner peace, and guided in ways that will bring about their greatest happiness, both in this world and the next. ¹⁷

As this episode comes to an end, the scribes who have been overhearing the conversation between Jesus and the Sadducees, are impressed. They say, “Teacher, You have spoken well” (Luke 20:39). For the moment, the religious leaders within us are silenced. As it is written, “After that, they no longer dared to question Him about anything” (Luke 20:40).

A practical application

In this episode, Jesus teaches not only that there is a resurrection but also that there is marriage in heaven. This is a crucial teaching, especially for people who yearn for the continuation of their marriage in the next world. It is here that human reason and divine wisdom perfectly concur. It simply makes sense that we are born to live forever and that true marriages will continue to exist “in the resurrection.” When husband and wife have become united in this life through a mutual desire to learn from God and do His will, their marriage will be an eternal one. That’s because self-interest, egotism, greed, and selfishness can no longer separate “what God has joined together.” In the light of this teaching, strive to honor the “spiritual marriage” with your spouse by subordinating self-interest. What can you change in your thoughts, attitudes, and actions that will make your spouse’s experience of being with you a little better? Whether married or not, do the same in terms of your “heavenly marriage” with God — a marriage which begins on earth and continues for eternity.

Is the Christ the Son of David?

41. And He said to them, How say they that the Christ is [the] son of David?

42. And David himself says in the Book of Psalms, The Lord said to my Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand,

43. Until I put Thine enemies [as] a footstool of Thy feet.

44. David therefore calls Him Lord, and how is He his son?

45. And in the hearing of all the people He said to His disciples,

46. Beware of the scribes who desire to walk in robes, and love greetings in the markets, and the first seats in the synagogues, and the first places to recline at suppers,

47. Who eat up widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayers; these shall receive all the more judgment.

The religious leaders, who were unable to trap Jesus in their controversial questions, are temporarily finished interrogating Him. In this next episode, then, Jesus asks the first question. He begins by asking them about the Messiah, who is also called “the Christ,” and is often referred to as the son of David. Jesus says, “How can they say that the Christ is David’s Son?” (Luke 20:41).

It had been prophesied that a direct descendant of King David would, like his forefather, reign as a king in Israel. In this regard, people often addressed Jesus as “David’s son” or as “the son of David.” As early as the first verse of the Gospel According to Matthew it is written that “This is the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the Son of David” (Matthew 1:1). And now, as Jesus approaches the final days of His ministry, He focuses on the question of His identity, setting it before the religious leaders like this: “Now David himself said in the Book of Psalms, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool.’ If David, therefore, calls Him ‘Lord,’ how then is He David’s Son?” (Luke 20:42-44).

When Jesus says, “The Lord said to my Lord,” He is referring to the first verse of Psalms 110 which begins with a picture of Jehovah speaking to the promised Messiah. In the original Hebrew, the speaker is Jehovah, the one God of the universe. He is communicating with the promised Messiah, the one who will come to earth as a king, anointed by God to set up an everlasting kingdom. This is why David, who sees all of this in spirit, does not refer to the Messiah as “my son,” but rather as “my Lord.” As Jesus says, “If David, therefore, calls Him ‘Lord,’ how then is He David’s Son?”

In raising this question, Jesus is directly addressing the original question asked by the religious leaders when they confronted Him in the temple. At that time, they questioned His authority, asking essentially, “Who gave you this authority? (Luke 20:2). Jesus is now, in this episode, answering that question. He is indicating that His authority comes not from man but from God. Furthermore, God will give Him the authority not only to set up a new kingdom, but also the power to lead His people to victory over all enemies. In the language of sacred scripture, the power to defeat spiritual enemies is described as “sitting at the right hand of God.” And subjugating those enemies is described as making them His “footstool.” ¹⁸

As we engage more deeply with Jesus’ question, we note that He is speaking about the power of divine love (Jehovah) which comes forth through divine truth (Jesus). This, then, is the deeper message contained in the scriptural statement, “Jehovah said to my Lord, sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool.” It refers to what happens when the divine love comes into each of our lives through the divine truth that Jesus teaches. Our spiritual enemies are conquered. ¹⁹

This is not the last lesson that Jesus will deliver while in the temple during these final days, but it is a powerful one. He is making it clear that He is not David’s son but rather David’s Lord, the promised Messiah who will sit at the right hand of God, making His enemies His footstool. In the literal sense, this a reference to the practice of triumphant kings who placed their foot upon the conquered enemy to represent victory. In David’s mind, this is a picture of the Messiah being empowered to wipe out all His enemies — turning them, so to speak, into His “footstool.” But Jesus, as Messiah, has come to establish a spiritual kingdom within each of us. Spiritually, this means that God can give us the power to subordinate the loves of self and of the world to all that is higher, the love of God and the love of the neighbor.

Ordained by God

As we have seen, the religious leaders tried to do everything they could to discredit Jesus. Their primary method was to raise controversial questions and then trap Him in His words. In this way, they hoped to show that Jesus was unauthorized to teach. If successful, they would be able to retain their power, and secure their positions of authority. They were unable to do so, however, because Jesus’ power and authority came from a different source.

Unlike the religious leaders, Jesus did not need to go around in long robes, or have the best seat in the synagogue in order to prove His authority or reveal the deeper meaning of the scriptures. He was not ordained by rabbinical councils, but rather by God. The love of God was His very essence, and it came forth in the truth He spoke. This was the only ordination He needed. As Jesus puts it, “Beware of the scribes, who desire to walk in long robes, love greetings in the marketplaces, the best seats in the synagogues, and the best places at feasts” (Luke 20:46).

Jesus also adds that the so-called religious “authorities” were neglecting their responsibilities. Instead of teaching people the truth, as they should have done, they were “devouring widows’ houses” (Luke 20:46-47). The phrase, “devouring widows’ houses” is sacred symbolism. It describes what takes place when people long for truth, but are deprived of that truth. It is compared to the deep grief a widow feels when she longs for her lost husband. Therefore, when Jesus accuses the religious leaders of “devouring widows’ houses,” He is saying that these corrupt leaders have been depriving people of the truth. They are the spiritual thieves and robbers in our own mind who mislead us by distorting, twisting, and perverting the truth. This is why Jesus concludes this episode by saying that the religious leaders “will receive greater condemnation” (Luke 20:47). ²⁰

A practical application

In this episode, Jesus describes Himself as “sitting at the right hand of God” where He receives power from on high to make His enemies His “footstool.” This is powerful imagery. The “right hand” of God describes the power of God’s love. It is so powerful that it can overcome all of our spiritual enemies — anger, resentment, self-pity, etc. But we can only receive this power through the truth that God gives us. With this in mind, select a passage of sacred scripture, seeing it as a container of deeper truth and designed to receive God’s inflowing love. As you strive to apply that truth to your life, notice how the divine love pours in with power to help you subjugate your tendencies towards selfishness. This is how God will make “your enemies your footstool.”

Poznámky pod čarou:

376. It has thus far been shown that "oil" signifies celestial good, which is the good of love to the Lord; it shall now be shown that "wine" signifies spiritual good, which is the good of charity towards the neighbor and the good of faith; and as this good in its essence is truth, it is said in the general explanation that "the oil and the wine hurt not," which signifies that there must no harm be done to the internal or spiritual sense of the Word in respect either to good or to truth, or what is the same, that there must no harm be done to the goods and truths which are in the internal or spiritual sense of the Word. The good of charity and the good of faith in their essence are truth, because that good is implanted by the Lord in man's intellectual part by means of the truths that are called the truths of faith, and when man lives according to these truths they become goods; for by means of truths a new will is formed in that part, and whatever proceeds from the will is called good. This will, moreover, is the same as conscience, and conscience is a conscience of truth, for it is formed by truths of every kind from the doctrine of the church, and from the sense of the letter of the Word (but on this subject see further in The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem 130-138; and the extracts from the Arcana Coelestia 139-141). From this now it is that "wine" signifies truth.

[2] Furthermore, there are goods and truths internal and external; internal goods and truths are signified by "the oil and the wine" that must not be hurt; but external goods and truths are signified by "wheat and barley." External goods and truths are those that are in the sense of the letter of the Word, while internal goods and truths are those that are in the internal or spiritual sense of the Word; or external goods and truths are such as are in the lower heavens with the angels there, that is, in the ultimates of heaven, while internal goods and truths are such as are in the higher heavens with the angels there, that is, in the third and second heavens. These goods and truths are genuine goods and truths themselves, but the former are truths and goods because they correspond, thus are correspondences; internal goods and truths have immediate communication with the angels of heaven, while external goods and truths have not an immediate but a mediate communication through correspondences. This is why the Jews, because they were only in the sense of the letter and had no knowledge of the signification of things in the spiritual sense, were unable to do harm to the spiritual sense in respect either to good or to truth, and consequently were unable to do harm to genuine goods and truths. So the Christian Church at this day is unable to do harm to the genuine goods and truths which are in the spiritual sense of the Word, for it has been ignorant of that sense, and at the same time ignorant of genuine goods and truths.

[3] The spiritual sense of the Word was not disclosed to Christians, because genuine goods and truths, such as are in the higher heavens, lie concealed in the spiritual sense of the Word; and so long as these goods and truths were unperceived and unknown that sense could not be opened, since these goods and truths could not be seen. In the Christian churches genuine goods and truths have not been perceived and known for the reason that those churches have been divided, in general, into the Papal and the Evangelical; and those in the Papal Church are utterly ignorant of truths, because they do not depend upon the Word, thus upon the Lord who is the Word, that is, Divine truth, but upon the pope, from whose mouth scarcely anything proceeds except what is from the love of ruling, and that love is from hell; therefore with them scarcely a single truth of the church exists; while in the Evangelical churches faith alone has been assumed as the essential means of salvation, and as a consequence the good of love and charity has been rejected as nonessential, and where good is rejected no truth which is truth in itself can exist, since all truth is from good; for the Lord flows into man's good, and by means of good illustrates him and gives him the light to perceive truths, therefore without that light, which is man's very spiritual life, there is no truth, however much it may sound like truth because it is from the Word; it is truth falsified by the ideas that are held in respect to it; for from faith separate from charity, or from truths without good, no other result can follow. This is why the spiritual sense of the Word could not be disclosed to the Christian churches, for if it had been disclosed, they would have falsified and perverted it by ideas from fallacies, and thus would have profaned it. This also is why no one will ever hereafter be admitted into the spiritual sense of the Word unless he is in genuine truths from good, and no one can be in genuine truths from good unless in heart he acknowledges the Lord alone as the God of heaven and earth, for from Him is every good and thence every truth. The spiritual sense of the Word is at this day opened, and therewith also genuine truths and goods are disclosed, because the Last Judgment has been accomplished by the Lord, and thus all things in the heavens and in the hells have been reduced to order; and for this reason it can be provided by the Lord that no harm can be done to genuine truths and goods, which are in the spiritual sense of the Word, and this could not have been provided before (See in the small work on The Last Judgment 73).

[4] That "wine" signifies spiritual good, or the good of charity and the good of faith, which in its essence is truth, can be seen from the following passages in the Word. In Isaiah:

Ho, everyone that thirsteth, come ye to the waters; and he that hath no silver; come ye, buy and eat; buy wine and milk without silver and without price (Isaiah 55:1).

Anyone can see that this does not mean that wine and milk may be bought without silver, "wine and milk" therefore signify things spiritual, namely, "wine" spiritual good, which in its essence is truth, as was said above, but "milk" the good of that truth. That these are given by the Lord freely to those who are ignorant of truth and good, and yet in a desire for these, is signified by "he that hath no silver, come ye, buy and eat; buy without silver;" "to buy" signifies to acquire for oneself, and "to eat" signifies to make one's own, which is done by application as from oneself. Those who are ignorant of truth and good, and yet are in a desire for them, are evidently meant, for it is said, "Ho, everyone that thirsteth, come ye to the waters," "to thirst" signifying to desire, and "waters" signifying truths, here the Word where truths are.

[5] In Joel:

It shall come to pass in that day, the mountains shall drop down sweet wine, and the hills shall flow with milk; all the water-courses of Judah shall flow with waters (Joel 3:18).

This treats of the Lord's coming, and of the new heaven and the new church from Him. It is well known that the mountains in the land of Canaan, or in Judea, did not then drop down sweet wine, nor the hills flow with milk, nor the water-courses of Judah flow with waters more than before, therefore these words must mean something else than new wine, milk, and waters, or than mountains, hills, and water-courses, namely, "that the mountains shall drop down sweet wine" [mustum] or wine [vinum], means that from the good of love to the Lord there shall be genuine truth; "the hills shall flow with milk" means that from the good of charity towards the neighbor there shall be spiritual life; and "all the water-courses of Judah shall flow with waters" means that from the particulars of the Word there shall be truths. (For "Judah" signifies the Lord's celestial kingdom, and also the Word, see Arcana Coelestia 3881[1-11], 6363; therefore "its water-courses" signify the particulars of the Word; that "mountains" signify the good of love to the Lord, n. Arcana Coelestia 795, 4210, 6435, 8327, 8758, 10438, 10608; and "hills" the good of charity towards the neighbor, n. 6435, 10438; and this because in heaven those who are in the good of love to the Lord dwell upon mountains, and those who are in the good of charity towards the neighbor dwell upon hills, n. Arcana Coelestia 10438, and Heaven and Hell, n. 188.)

[6] In Amos:

Behold the days come, that the ploughman shall overtake the reaper, and the treader of grapes him that draweth forth seed; and the mountains shall drop down sweet wine, and all the hills shall dissolve. I will bring back the captivity of My people Israel, and they shall build the waste cities; and they shall inhabit them, and they shall plant vineyards and drink the wine thereof, and they shall make gardens and eat the fruit of them. Then will I plant them upon their ground (Amos 9:13-15).

This chapter treats first of the vastation of the church, and then of its restoration by the Lord; and "the people Israel" do not mean that people, but those with whom the church was to be established; and "the ploughman shall overtake the reaper, and the treader of grapes him that draweth forth the seed," signifies that he who receives good and truth shall also perform uses, or bear fruit, thus that with the man of the church the two shall be present at the same time; "the mountains shall drop down sweet wine, and all the hills shall dissolve," signifies, as just above, that from the good of love to the Lord and from the good of charity towards the neighbor there shall be truths in abundance, "sweet wine" here, or "wine," meaning truth; that "the captivity of the people Israel shall be brought back" signifies the restoration of the church among the Gentiles, for "captivity" means spiritual captivity, in which those are who are remote from goods and truths, and yet in a desire for them (See Arcana Coelestia 9164). "The waste cities that they shall build" signify the doctrinals of truth and good from the Word, before destroyed and at that time to be restored; "the vineyards which they shall plant," and "the wine of which they shall drink," signify all things of the church from which there is intelligence, "a vineyard" signifies the spiritual church, and therefore "vineyards" signify all things of the church; "wine" signifies the truth of the church in general, and "to drink it" signifies to be instructed and become intelligent, thus intelligence; and "the gardens which they shall make, and the fruit of which they shall eat," signifies wisdom, "gardens" meaning all things of intelligence, and their "fruit" signifying the goods of life, thus "to eat their fruit" signifies the appropriation of good, thus wisdom, for wisdom comes when truths are committed to the life; and because this is what is meant, therefore it is said of Israel, "I will plant them upon their ground."

[7] In Moses:

He bindeth his foal to the vine, the son of his she-ass unto the noble vine; he washeth his vesture in wine, and his covering in the blood of the grapes. His eyes are red with wine, and his teeth white with milk (Genesis 49:1, 12).

This is in the prophecy of Israel the father respecting Judah, by whom here Judah is not meant, but the Lord in relation to the celestial kingdom; and "wine" and the "blood of grapes" mean the Divine truth. (What the rest signifies, and that "wine" signifies Divine truth, because this has reference to the Lord, see Arcana Coelestia 6375-6381.)

[8] In the same:

Jacob brought of his venison to his father Isaac, and he did eat; and he brought him wine, and he drank. And Isaac blessed him, saying, God give thee of the dew of heaven, and of the fatnesses of the earth, and plenty of corn and new wine (Genesis 27:25, 27-28, 37).

Those who do not know that the Word is spiritual in its particulars may suppose that by "Isaac" here is meant Isaac, and by "Jacob" Jacob, and therefore that by "the fatnesses of the earth," and "the corn and new wine," no other and deeper things are meant; but "Isaac" here represents the Lord, and "Jacob" the church; thence the "fatnesses of the earth" mean the celestial things that are of the good of love; and "corn and new wine" every good and truth of the church. (But these words may also be seen explained in Arcana Coelestia n. 3570, 3579, 3580.)

[9] In the same:

If ye shall harken to My commandments, I will give rain to your land in its time, the former rain and the latter rain; and thou shall gather in thy corn, and thy new wine, and thy fresh oil (Deuteronomy 11:13-14).

These blessings of the earth were promised to the sons of Israel if they would hear and do the commandments of Jehovah, and the blessings followed because with them the church was representative, and the things that were said and commanded by Jehovah corresponded to things spiritual, thus these blessings of the earth to the blessings of heaven. The blessings of heaven, to which the blessings of the earth correspond, all have reference to the things that are of the good of love and the truth of faith; these blessings therefore are signified by "the former rain and the latter rain," for "rain" in particular signifies Divine truth flowing in out of heaven, from which all things of the church and heaven with man are born, grow, and are brought forth; therefore "the corn, new wine, and oil, which they should gather in," signify every good and truth of the external and internal man.

[10] In the same:

Thus Israel dwelt securely, alone by the fountain of Jacob, in a land of corn and new wine; yea, his heavens shall drop down dew (Deuteronomy 33:28).

This was the conclusion of the blessings of the sons of Israel by Moses, which were all prophetical, and every son or every tribe of Israel signified something of the church (as in Genesis 49); and here "Israel" signifies the church itself; and "to dwell securely, alone by the fountain of Jacob," signifies to live without infestation from evils and falsities, and to be led by the Lord alone through Divine truth, the "fountain of Jacob" meaning Divine truth and the Word; and "to live in a land of corn and new wine" signifies in every good and truth of the church; and "yea, his heavens shall drop down dew," signifies influx out of heaven.

[11] In the same:

He made him ride upon the high places of the earth, and gave him butter of the herd, and milk of the flock, with the fat of lambs, and of rams, the sons of Bashan, and of he-goats, with the fat of the kidneys of wheat; and thou drinkest the blood of the grape, unmixed wine (Deuteronomy 32:13-14).

These things are said of the Ancient Church, which was the church previous to the Israelitish Church, and was in the good of charity and in truths of faith. The goods of every kind, in which it was, are meant by these things, namely, the "butter of the herd," the "milk of the flock," "the fat of lambs," "the fat of rams," "the fat of goats," "the fat of the kidneys of wheat;" and spiritual truths are meant by "the blood of the grape" and "unmixed wine."

[12] In Jeremiah:

They shall come and sing aloud in the height of Zion, and shall flow together unto the good of Jehovah, to the corn, and to the new wine, and to the fresh oil, and to the sons of the flock and of the herd (Jeremiah 31:12).

"Corn," "new wine," and "fresh oil," signify goods and truth of every kind (what these mean in particular, see above, n. 374). In Isaiah:

Jehovah hath sworn by His right hand, and by the arm of His strength, Surely I will no longer give thy corn to be food for thine enemies, and the sons of the alien shall not drink thy new wine for which thou hast labored; but they that gather it shall eat it and praise Jehovah, and they that bring it together shall drink it in the courts of holiness (Isaiah 62:8-9).

This is said of Jerusalem, which signifies the church in relation to doctrine; therefore "the corn that shall no longer be given as food for the enemies, and the new wine that the sons of the alien shall not drink" signify in general the good and truth of the church, which shall no longer be consumed by evils and falsities; "enemies" here meaning evils, and "the sons of the alien" falsities, and "to eat," or "to have food given them," and "to drink," mean to consume. That goods and truths will remain with those who receive them, and thence make use of them, is signified by "they that gather it shall eat it," and "they that bring it together shall drink it;" worship from these is signified by "praising Jehovah," and "drinking in the courts of holiness."

[13] In the same:

Gladness is taken away, and exultation from Carmel; and in the vineyards there is no singing aloud, no shouting for joy; the treader treadeth not out the wine in the wine-vats; I have made the vintage-shouting to cease (Isaiah 16:10).

This describes the taking away of the heavenly enjoyment that is from good and its truths, because good and truth itself is taken away; the good of the church is meant by "Carmel," and its truths by "vineyards" and by "treading out the wine in the wine-vats;" the enjoyments thereof that are taken away are meant by "gladness," "exultation," "singing aloud," "shouting," and "vintage-shouting," for it was a custom to sing in the vineyards, and in the winepresses when the grape was trodden into wine, that enjoyments from truths, which were signified by "wine," might be represented.

[14] In Jeremiah:

With more than the weeping of Jazer I will weep for thee, O vine of Sibmah; thy shoots are passed over the sea, they reach even to the sea of Jazer; upon thy autumn fruits, and upon thy vintage the devastator is fallen. Whence gladness and exultation is gathered out of Carmel, and out of the land of Moab; and I have caused the wine to cease in the wine-vats; none shall tread with shouting; their shouting shall be no shouting (Jeremiah 48:32-33).

This also treats of the taking away of the heavenly enjoyment that is from the good of love and the truths thence, for all heavenly enjoyment is in these and from these. Lamentation over it is meant by "weeping" [flere fletum]; deprivation of it is meant by "gladness and exultation is gathered out of Carmel," likewise by "the devastator falling upon it," "the wine failing," and "the shouting being no shouting;" the good that was taken away, for which there was lamentation, is meant by "the autumn fruits;" and the truths of good that were taken away are meant by "the vintage," and by "the wine in the wine-vats." That truths were banished, and that they perished through knowledges [scientifica] is meant by "the vine of Sibmah," and by its "shoots that have gone over the sea, even to the sea of Jazer," "sea" signifying the knowing faculty [scientificum].

[15] In Lamentations:

The infant and the suckling faint in the broad places of the city. They say to their mothers, Where is the corn and the wine? when they faint as one pierced in the broad places of the city, when their soul is poured out upon their mother's bosom (Lam. 2:11-12).

These words contain a lamentation over the Jewish Church, that every good and truth thereof has perished; and the lamentation is described by "the infant and the suckling who faint in the broad places of the city, and say to their mothers, Where is the corn and the wine?" The "infant and the suckling" signify those who are in the good of innocence, and in an abstract sense, the good of innocence itself; by this good every good of the church is meant, since it is the essential of all its goods (See in the work on Heaven and Hell, n. 276-283, 285, 288, 341, 382). "The broad places of the city" signify the truths of doctrine; "mothers" all things of the church; "corn and wine" all the good and truth of the church in general. It is said that "they faint as one pierced in the broad places of the city, when their soul is poured out upon their mother's bosom," because "one pierced" signifies those who perish spiritually from the deprivation of truth, and "soul" signifies spiritual life. (That "the broad places of the city, in which they faint," signify the truths of doctrine, see Arcana Coelestia, n. 2336; and that "the mother, into whose bosom the soul is poured out," signifies the church, n. 2691, 2717, 3703, 4257, 5581, 8897)

[16] In Zephaniah:

Their wealth shall be for plunder, and their houses for a waste, that they may build houses but not inhabit them, and plant vineyards but not drink the wine thereof (Zephaniah 1:13).

The "wealth that shall be for plunder" signifies spiritual wealth, which is the knowledges of good and truth; "the houses that shall be for devastation" signify the things of the church in man; that from these when devastated one profits nothing and receives nothing, even though he listens to them, and sees them in the Word, is signified by "building and not inhabiting, and planting vineyards and not drinking the wine thereof," "houses" meaning the goods of the church, and "vineyards" with "wine" its truths.

[17] Like things are meant in Micah:

Thou shalt sow but shalt not reap; thou shalt tread the olive but shalt not anoint thee with oil, and the new wine but shall not drink wine (Micah 6:15).

In Amos:

Vineyards of desire shall ye plant, but ye shall not drink the wine of them (Amos 5:11).

And in Hosea:

The threshing-floor and the wine-vat shall not feed them, and the new wine shall dissemble unto them. They shall not pour forth wine to Jehovah, and these shall not be agreeable unto Him (Hosea 9:2, 4).

The "threshing-floor and the wine-vat" signify the same as "corn and wine," because corn and wine are there collected; that they will not profit by what they hear is signified by "they shall not feed them, and the new wine shall dissemble unto them;" and that thence their worship is not accepted is signified by "they shall not pour forth wine to Jehovah, and these (that is, the offerings) shall not be agreeable unto Him."

[18] In Joel:

Awake, ye drunkards, and weep; and howl, all ye drinkers of wine, because of the sweet wine which is cut off from your mouth. The field is devastated, the ground mourned, for the corn was devastated, the new wine was dried up, the fresh oil languisheth; the husbandmen were ashamed; the vine-dressers howled (Joel 1:5, 10-11).

What these words signify in the spiritual sense, may be seen above n. 374, where they are explained; "wine" and "sweet wine" meaning the truth of the church, and "vine-dressers" those who are in truths and teach them. This treats of a devastated church, in which goods and truths have perished.

[19] In Ezekiel:

Damascus was thy trader in the multitude of thy works, in the multitude of all riches, in the wine of Heshbon ¹ and the wool of Zachar (Ezekiel 27:18).

This is said of Tyre, which signifies the church in relation to the knowledges of good and truth; and "Damascus," which was a city in Syria, signifies the concordant knowing faculty [scientificum]; and the "tradings" referred to in this chapter signify the acquisition and communication and also the use of these. Because "Damascus" signifies the concordant knowing faculty, it is called a "trader in the multitude of all works and riches," "works" by which uses are effected, signifying the knowledges of good, and "riches" the knowledges of truth; and as the knowledges of truth and good are in the natural man, for therein is everything pertaining to cognition and knowing that is perceptible, therefore it is said "in the wine of Heshbon and the wool of Zachar," the "wine of Heshbon" signifying natural truth, and the "wool of Zachar" natural good.

[20] In Isaiah:

A malediction shall devour the earth; the new wine shall mourn, the vine shall languish, all the glad of heart shall sigh. They shall not drink wine with a song; strong drink shall be bitter to them that drink it. The city of voidness shall be broken down; every house shall be shut, that no one come in (Isaiah 24:6-7, 9-10).

These words describe the perversion of the church, which takes place when falsity rules in place of truth, whence there is no longer any good; for man has good by means of truths. "The earth that the malediction will devour" signifies the church, "malediction" meaning its perversion; the "new wine that will mourn," and the "vine that will languish," signify all truth of the church, "to mourn" and "to languish" signifying deprivation of it; that there shall no longer be any heavenly enjoyment and blessedness is signified by "all the glad of heart shall sigh, they shall not drink wine with a song;" that they shall turn away from all things that agree with truths is signified by "strong drink shall be bitter to them that drink it," "strong drink" signifying the things that are from truths and agree with them. But that the doctrine of falsity shall be destroyed is signified by "the city of voidness shall be broken down," "city" meaning doctrine, and "a void" falsity; and that there shall no longer be any good or wisdom with man is signified by "every house shall be shut, that no one come in," which takes place when there is no truth, but only falsity.

[21] In Amos:

Who drink out of bowls of wine, and anoint themselves with the firstfruits of the oils; but they are not grieved for the breach of Joseph (Amos 6:6).

This and what precedes in that chapter describes those who are in external worship without internal, such as the Jews were formerly and still are; the "bowls of wine out of which they drink" are the externals of truth from which is worship; and the "firstfruits of the oils with which they anoint themselves" are the externals of good, from which also is worship; "Joseph" signifies the internal of the church or its spiritual; not being affected because this perishes is signified by "they are not grieved for his breach." (That external worship without internal is no worship, see Arcana Coelestia 1094, 1175, 7724; that the Jews were formerly and still are in external worship without internal, n. 1200, 3147, 3479, 8871; that "Joseph" signifies the spiritual church, thus also the spiritual of the church, n. 3969, 3971, 4669, 6417)

[22] In Zechariah:

I will render the house of Judah mighty and I will save the house of Joseph; on this account they shall be as the mighty Ephraim, and their heart shall be glad as if with wine (Zechariah 10:6-7).

"The house of Judah" signifies the Lord's celestial church, and the "house of Joseph" the Lord's spiritual church; and "to render mighty their houses" signifies to multiply with them truths from good, for all might is of truth from good; therefore it is said, "they shall be as the mighty Ephraim;" "Ephraim" signifying the understanding of truth from good, which is called mighty from its multiplication; heavenly enjoyment therefrom is signified by "their heart shall be glad as if with wine," "wine" meaning truth from good from which that enjoyment comes. (That truths have all power from good, see in the work o n Heaven and Hell 228-233; and also above, n. 209, 333; that "Judah" in the Word signifies the Lord's celestial kingdom, Arcana Coelestia 3881[1-11], 6363; and "Ephraim" the intellectual of the church, n. 3969, 5354, 6222, 6234, 6238, 6267, 6296.)

[23] In Daniel:

Belshazzar king of Babylon, and his magnates, and his wives, and his concubines, drank wine out of vessels of the temple of Jerusalem, and praised the gods of silver, brass, iron, wood, and stone. Therefore there was written on the wall, Numbered, weighed, and divided. And then he [Nebuchadnezzar] was driven out from the sons of man, and his dwelling was with the wild asses (Daniel 5:2-5, 21).

In the internal sense this describes the profanation of good and truth, which also is meant by "Babel" or "Babylon;" for "to drink wine out of the vessels of the temple of Jerusalem" signifies to draw the truths of the church from the Word, "to drink wine" meaning to draw truths, and "the vessels of the temple of Jerusalem" meaning the truths that belong to the doctrine of the church from the Word; and "to praise the gods of gold, silver, brass, iron, wood, and stone" signifies worship from the love of self and the world; for these gods signify idolatrous worship of every kind, and profanation; that it was therefore written on the wall, "numbered, weighed, divided" signifies separation from all things of heaven and the church. That afterwards "the king was driven out from the sons of man, and his dwelling was with the wild asses" signifies separation from all truth, and the allotment of his life with the infernals, "sons of man" meaning the truths of the church, "wild asses" those who are in dire falsities like those in the hells, and "dwelling" meaning the allotment of the life.

[24] In Joel:

They have cast a lot upon My people; for they have given a boy for a harlot, and sold a girl for wine, which they drank (Joel 3:3).

"To cast lots upon the people" signifies to dissipate the truths of the church, "to cast a lot" signifying to dissipate, and "people" signifying the church in relation to truths, thus also the truths of the church; "to give a boy for a harlot" signifies to falsify truth, "boy" meaning the truth of the church, and "harlot" falsity; and "to sell a girl for wine, which they drank" signifies to pervert the good of the church by truth falsified, "girl" meaning the good of the church, and "wine" truth falsified.

[25] Because "wine" signified the truth of the church that is from good, it was commanded that, with the sacrifices upon the altar, a meal-offering and a drink-offering should be offered, and the meal-offering was bread, and the drink-offering wine; these signified worship of the Lord from the good of love, and from the truths therefrom; for all worship is from these. (On the drink-offerings, the portions of wine with them at the different sacrifices, see Exodus 29:40, 41; Leviticus 23:13, 18; Numbers 6:1-4, 15, 17; 15:4-7, 10, 24; 28:7-10, 24, 31; 29:6, 11, 16, 19, 22, 25, 27, 28, 31, 34, 38, 39; and besides Genesis 35:14) This makes clear what is signified in Joel:

The meal-offering and the drink-offering was cut off from the house of Jehovah; the priests, the ministers (of the altar), mourned (Joel 1:9);

namely, that worship from the good of love, and from the truths therefrom, had perished. Who cannot see that the meal-offering and the drink-offering, which were bread and wine, were not pleasing to Jehovah in worship, unless they had signified such things as are of heaven and the church?

[26] From this it can now be seen what the bread and wine in the Holy Supper involve, namely, the bread, the good of love to the Lord from the Lord, and the wine, the good of faith, which in its essence is truth. (But on the Holy Supper and the bread and wine of it, see The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem 210-222.) Because "wine" signifies the good of faith, which in its essence is truth, when the Lord instituted the sacrament of the supper, He said:

I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this product of the vine until that day when I will drink it with you new in My Father's kingdom (Matthew 26:29).

I say unto you, I will not drink of the product of the vine until the kingdom of God shall come (Luke 22:18).

"The product of the vine," that is, "wine," which the Lord "would drink with them new in His Father's kingdom," or "when the kingdom of God should come," means that all Divine truth in heaven and the church would then be from His Divine Human; He therefore calls it "new," and also He calls it "the new testament in his blood" (Luke 22:20); for "the Lord's blood" has a like signification as "wine" (See above, n. 30, 328, 329). And as everything Divine, since the Lord has risen, proceeds from Him, He says that He will drink it with them when the kingdom of God shall come, and it came when He reduced all things to order in the heavens and in the hells. That the kingdom of God came at the same time with the Lord and that it is from Him can be seen from Matthew 3:2; 4:8; 10:7; 12:28; 16:28; Mark 1:14, 15; 9:1; Luke 1:32, 33; 9:11, 27, 60; 10:11; 16:16; 17:20, 21; 23:42, 51; John 18:36. Now, because "bread" signifies the good of love, and "wine" the good of faith, which in its essence is the truth from that good, and in the highest sense, "bread" signifies the Lord in respect to Divine good, and "wine" the Lord in respect to Divine truth, and because there is a correspondence between spiritual things and natural, (and such a correspondence that when "bread" and "wine" are in man's thought, the good of love and the good of faith are in the angels' thoughts), and because all things of heaven and the church have reference to the good of love and the good of faith, therefore the Lord instituted the Holy Supper in order that by means of it there might be a conjunction of the angels of heaven with the men of the church.

[27] Because such things are meant by "bread and wine" in heaven, therefore:

Melchizedek, king of Salem, going out to meet Abram, brought out bread and wine; and he was a priest to God Most High. And he blessed Abram (Genesis 14:18-19).

"Melchizedek" here represents the Lord in relation to Divine good and in relation to Divine truth, as priest in relation to Divine good, and as king to Divine truth; therefore he "brought out bread and wine," "bread" signifying Divine good, and "wine" Divine truth; or when applied to man, "bread" signifying the good of love to the Lord, and "wine" the good of faith, which is from the reception of Divine truth.

[28] The "wine" spoken of by the Lord in the following passages has a like signification:

They do not put new wine into old wine-skins, else the skins burst, and the wine is spilled; but they put [new] wine into fresh wine-skins, and both are preserved (Matthew 9:17).

And no man having drunk old wine straightway desireth new; for he saith, The old is more useful (Luke 5:39).

This comparison, like all others in the Word, is from correspondences, "wine" signifying truth, "old wine" the truth of the old or Jewish Church, and "wine-skins" things that contain, "old wine-skins" the statutes and judgments of the Jewish Church, and "fresh wine-skins" the precepts and commandments of the Lord. That the statutes and judgments of the Jewish Church, which related especially to sacrifices and representative worship, are not in agreement with the truths of the Christian Church is meant by "they do not put new wine into old wine-skins, else the wine-skins burst and the wine is spilled; but they put [new] wine into fresh wine-skins, and both are preserved together." That those who have been born and educated in the externals of the Jewish Church cannot be brought immediately into the internals belonging to the Christian Church is signified by "no man having drunk old wine straightway desireth new; for he saith, "The old is more useful."

[29] The same is signified by "the water turned into wine at Cana of Galilee," thus described in John:

At the wedding in Cana of Galilee, when the wine failed, there were six water-pots of stone set there, according to the cleansing of the Jews. Jesus said, Fill the water-pots; and they filled them to the brim. Then he said unto them Draw out now, and bear unto the ruler of the feast; and they bare it. While the ruler of the feast tasted the water that was made wine, he calleth the bridegroom, and saith unto him, Every man setteth on first the good wine; and when they have had enough, the inferior; thou hast kept the good wine until now (John 2:1-10).

It should be known that all the miracles done by the Lord, as well as all the miracles by Him spoken of in the Old Testament, signified, that is, contained within them, such things as belong to heaven and the church, and that thence His miracles were Divine (See Arcana Coelestia 7337, 8364, 9051). So with this miracle; here, as elsewhere in the Word, "a wedding" signifies the church; "in Cana of Galilee" means among the Gentiles; "water" the truth of the external church, such as was the truth of the Jewish Church from the sense of the letter of the Word, and "wine" the truth of the internal church, such as is the truth of the Christian Church; therefore the Lord's "making the water wine" signifies that of the truths of the external church He will make truths of the internal church by opening the internal things that have lain concealed in them. "The six water-pots of stone, set there according to the cleansing of the Jews," signify all these truths in the Word, and thence in the Jewish Church and its worship; these were all representative and significative of things Divine in the Lord and from the Lord, which contained things eternal. For this reason there were "six water-pots of stone, set for the cleansing of the Jews;" the number "six" signifies all, and is predicated of truths; "stone" signifies truth, and "the cleansing of the Jews" purification from sins; thus all things of the Jewish Church are signified, since that church regards purification from sins as its all, for so far as anyone is purified from sins, so far he becomes a church. "The ruler of the feast" means those who are in the knowledges of truth; his saying to the bridegroom, "every man setteth on first the good wine; and when men have had enough, the inferior; thou hast kept the good wine until now," signifies that every church has its beginning in truths from good, but falls away into truths not of good, but that now, at the end of the church, truth from good, or genuine truth, is granted, namely by the Lord.

[30] It is because "wine" signifies the truth of the church, and "oil" the good of the church, that the Lord says, in the parable of the man who was wounded by thieves:

That the Samaritan poured oil and wine into his wounds (Luke 10:33-34);

where "the man wounded by thieves" means those who are infested and have their conscience hurt by evil men, who are "robbers;" and "the Samaritan" means the Gentiles that are in the good of charity; therefore "his pouring into his wounds oil and wine" signifies the spiritual things that heal a man thus injured, "oil" meaning the good of love, and "wine" the good of faith, or truth. What the rest signifies, namely, "that he set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and told them to take care of him," may be seen above (n. 375[8]), where they are explained. That "wine" signifies the truth of the church can be seen not only from the passages cited, but also from others in the Word (as Isaiah 1:21, 22; 25:6; 36:17; Hosea 7:4, 5, 14; 14:5-7; Amos 2:8; Zechariah 9:15, 17; Psalms 104:14-16).

[31] As most things in the Word have also a contrary sense, so, too, has "wine," and in that sense it signifies truth falsified, and also falsity, as in the following passages. In Isaiah:

Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim, to the flower of his fading adornment, which is on the head of the valley of the fat ones frenzied with wine; the crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, they shall be trampled under the feet; these go astray through wine, and through strong drink they err; the priest and the prophet go astray through strong drink, they are swallowed up of wine, they err through wine, ² they go astray among the seeing, they waver in judgment (Isaiah 28:1, 3, 7).

This is said of those who are insane in things spiritual because they believe themselves to be intelligent of themselves, and glory in it; the state of such is here described by pure correspondences; those who are insane in things spiritual or in truths are meant by "the drunkards," and those who thence believe themselves intelligent by "Ephraim," and hence glorying in intelligence or learning is meant by the "crown of pride;" for those who are in falsities of doctrine and have confirmed themselves in them, when they are illustrated and see truths, in the other life become like drunkards. The learned who have confirmed themselves in falsities become such, and to confirm oneself in falsities is to confirm from oneself and not from the Lord. This makes clear what is signified by "woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim;" "the flower of the fading adornment that is on the head of the valley of the fat ones frenzied with wine" signifies the truth of the church destroyed even as it is born by the glorying of the self-intelligence that is of the natural man separated from the spiritual, when falsity is seen instead of truth, "the flower of the adornment" meaning truth as it is born declining or perished; "the head of the valley of the fat ones" means the intelligence of the natural man; "frenzied with wine" means those who see falsity in place of truth; "the crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, they shall be trampled under the feet," signifies that this intelligence shall utterly perish; "these go astray through wine, and through strong drink they err," signifies through falsities and through such things as are from falsities; "the priest and the prophet go astray through strong drink, they are swallowed up of wine, they are gone astray through strong drink," signifies that such are those who ought to be in the doctrine of good and truth, and in a sense abstracted from persons that such is their doctrine itself; "they go astray among the seeing, they waver in judgment," signifies that they do not see the truths of intelligence. That these words have such a signification no one can see except from the spiritual sense; without that it could not be known that "crown" and "head" signify intelligence, that "drunkards" signify those who are insane in things spiritual, that "Ephraim" signifies here man's own understanding, or that which is from himself, that "valley" signifies the lower things of the mind, which are natural and sensual, and that "priest and prophet" signify the doctrine of good and truth.

[32] In the same:

Linger ye, wonder, be astounded, and cry out; they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink; for Jehovah hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed up your eyes; the prophets and your heads, the seers hath He covered (Isaiah 29:9-10).

This is said of those who can see nothing of truth when they hear or read it from the Word; those who are such are called "drunken but not with wine," and "they stagger, but not with strong drink," "wine" signifying in particular the truth of the spiritual and thus of the rational man, and "strong drink" the truth of the natural man therefrom. Because such are meant it is said, "Jehovah hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed up your eyes," "the spirit of deep sleep" meaning no perception, and the "eyes closed up" no understanding. "The prophets and your heads [the seers] hath He covered," signifies those who are in the doctrine of truth and were wise and intelligent thence; "prophets" signify those who are in the doctrine of truth, and in an abstract sense, doctrine itself, "heads" signify the wise, and in an abstract sense, wisdom, and "seers" signify the intelligent, and in an abstract sense, intelligence. Wonder at such gross stupidity is described by "Linger ye, wonder, be astounded," and lamentation over it by "cry out." Such are those who are in a life of evil, and at the same time in the principles of falsity, however learned they are believed to be; for a life of evil shuts out the perception of good by which thought has life and light, and the principles of falsity shut out the understanding of truth, on which account they see from the sensual man only, and not at all from the spiritual.

[33] In the same:

The dogs are strong of soul, they know not satiety; and they are shepherds who know not intelligence. Come, I will take wine and we will be drunk with strong drink (Isaiah 56:11-12).

This is said of those who care for nothing but worldly and earthly things, which close the internal spiritual man. These, from having no perception of good and no understanding of truth, are called "dogs strong of soul, they know not satiety," that is, they are unable to receive good, "to know" here signifies to be able, and "satiety" reception of good, for satiety is predicated of food, by which spiritual nourishment is signified. That they have no understanding of truth is meant by "they are shepherds who know not intelligence;" those are called "shepherds" who believe themselves able to instruct others, for "to feed" means to instruct; and because such persons love falsities and things falsified, it is added, "Come, I will take wine, and we will be drunk with strong drink."

[34] In Jeremiah:

Thus said Jehovah, God of Israel, Every bottle shall be filled with wine. Behold I fill all the inhabitants of this land, and the kings sitting for David upon his throne, and the priests and the prophets, all the inhabitants of Jerusalem with drunkenness (Jeremiah 13:12-13).

Here, too, "wine" signifies falsity, and "every bottle that shall be filled with wine" signifies the mind of man, since the mind is a recipient of truth or of falsity, as a bottle is of wine; "the kings sitting for David upon his throne" signify those who would otherwise be in Divine truths, "priests" those who would be in Divine goods, "prophets," those who would be in doctrine, "the inhabitants of Jerusalem" all who are of the church; and "the drunkenness with which they shall be filled" signifies insanity in spiritual things.

[35] In the same:

I am become like a drunkard, and like a man into whom wine hath passed, because of Jehovah, and because of the words of His Holiness. For the land is full of adulterers (Jeremiah 23:9-10).

This is a lamentation over the adulteration of good and falsification of truth in the church, which is signified by "the land is full of adulterers;" these are meant by "adulteries," and the church by "land." Insanity in spiritual things through reasonings from evils against Divine goods and from falsities against Divine truth is signified by, "I am become like a drunkard, and like a man into whom wine has passed, because of Jehovah, and because of the words of His Holiness;" "to become like a drunkard and like a man into whom wine hath passed" signifies confusion of mind and insanity by reasoning from evils and falsities; "because of Jehovah" signifies because of Divine goods, and "because of the words of his holiness" signifies because of Divine truths.

[36] In Isaiah:

Hear now this, thou afflicted, and drunken but not with wine (Isaiah 51:21).

The "drunken but not with wine," mean here those who are in falsities from ignorance of truth. That:

Noah drank of the wine and was drunken, and therefore lay naked in the midst of his tent (Genesis 9:21);

means in the spiritual sense, something entirely different from the meaning in the letter; likewise:

Lot's being made drunken by his daughters, and their then lying with him (Genesis 19:32-34).

What is meant by the drunkenness of Noah in the spiritual sense may be seen in Arcana Coelestia 1070-1081); and what by the drunkenness of Lot (n. 2465 end). "Drunkenness" also elsewhere in the Word signifies insanity in spiritual things, and lapsing into errors (Isaiah 19:11, 12, 14; Jeremiah 25:27; Joel 1:5-7; Jeremiah 51:7; Leviticus 10:8, 9).

[37] That "wine" in a contrary sense signifies falsity, is also evident from Isaiah:

Woe unto them that rise early in the morning, that follow strong drink; to them that delay until twilight till wine inflames them. But they do not look upon the work of Jehovah, and they see not the working of His hands. Woe to the wise in their own eyes, and the intelligent before their own faces. Woe unto the mighty in drinking wine, and to men of strength to mingle strong drink (Isaiah 5:11-12, 21-22).

This is said of those who frame for themselves doctrinals from self-intelligence not from the Lord, or from Him out of the Word, which consequently are mere falsities. "Woe unto them who rise early in the morning, who follow strong drink, to them who delay until twilight till wine inflame them; but they do not look upon the work of Jehovah, and they see not the working of His hands" signifies therefore the perverted states of those who believe that they are illustrated of themselves, whence they are in falsities of doctrine, and care not for the Word, from which they might know goods and truths of life and of doctrine. "To rise early in the morning," and "to delay until twilight" signifies to be illustrated; and "to follow strong drink," and "to be inflamed with wine" signifies to hatch out doctrinals of themselves; "not to look upon the work of Jehovah," and "not to see the working of His hands" signifies not to care for the Word, or the goods of life and the truths of doctrine there disclosed; "the work of Jehovah" is predicated of the goods of life, and "the working of His hands" of the truths of doctrine, both from the Word; because such persons are meant, therefore it is said, "Woe to the wise in their own eyes, and the intelligent before their own faces;" "the wise in their own eyes" signifying those who are wise from their own intelligence, and "the intelligent before their own faces" signifying those who are intelligent from their own affection, "eyes" signifying the understanding, and "face" affection. And "woe unto the mighty in drinking wine, and to men of strength to mingle strong drink," signifies unto such as aspire after great things, and are ingenious in confirming the falsities that favor the loves of self and their own principles; "the mighty" are those who aspire to great things; "men of strength" those who are ingenious, and seem to themselves to be intelligent; "to drink wine" means to imbibe falsities, and "to mingle strong drink" means to confirm them. Such are all those who are in the love of self, and who seek after the reputation for learning, for such are in what is their own, and cannot be elevated above it; therefore their own thought is in the corporeal sensual, by which no truth is seen, and no spiritual good is perceived. But those who are not in the love of self, and who seek intelligence for the sake of the uses of life, are elevated by the Lord from what is their own into the light of heaven, and though not themselves aware of it, are illustrated.

[38] In Hosea:

Whoredom and new wine have taken up the heart. My people ask the wood, and their rod answereth them; for the spirit of whoredom hath led them astray, and they have committed whoredom under their God. Ephraim is joined to idols; their wine is gone; in whoring they commit whoredom (Hosea 4:11-12, 17-18).

This treats of those who falsify truths; the falsification of truth is signified by "whoredom," and the falsity therefrom by "new wine." This makes clear what is signified by "whoredom and new wine have taken up the heart; the spirit of whoredoms hath seduced them, they have committed whoredom under their God, and the wine hath departed, in whoring they commit whoredom," namely, that such falsify Divine truths, and consequently have no truth at all, "to commit whoredom under their God" signifies to falsify Divine truths, and "the wine hath departed" signifies that consequently they have no truth at all; "Ephraim, who is joined to idols" signifies those who are in self-intelligence, and the "idols to which he is joined" signify the falsities of religion. "My people ask the wood, and their rod answereth them" signifies that they consult their self-love, and favor it from self-intelligence; for "wood" or an idol of wood, which they ask, signifies self-love, and "the rod that answers" signifies power from what is one's own, thus intelligence.

[39] In Revelation:

Babylon is fallen is fallen, the great city, because of the wine of the wrath of her whoredom she hath made all nations to drink. If anyone worshipeth the beast he shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which hath been mingled unmixed in the cup of the anger [of God]; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone (Revelation 14:8-10);

I will show thee the judgment of the great harlot that sitteth upon many waters, with whom the kings of the earth committed whoredom, and they that dwell in the earth were made drunk from the wine of her whoredom (Revelation 17:1-2).

For of the wine of the wrath of her whoredom have all nations drunk, and the kings of the earth have committed whoredom with her (Revelation 18:3).

"The wine of the anger of God" signifies the falsity of evil, and "the wine of whoredom" signifies truth falsified; what the rest means will appear in the explanation of it, likewise what these words mean in Revelation:

Babylon the great was remembered before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the wrath of God's anger (Revelation 16:19);

"The wine of God's anger" having the same meaning as "the chalice, or cup, of God's anger."

[40] In Jeremiah:

Babylon hath been a cup of gold in the hand of Jehovah, making the whole earth drunken; the nations have drunk of her wine, therefore the nations are mad (Jeremiah 51:7).

And in David:

There is a cup in the hand of Jehovah, and He hath mingled the wine, hath filled it with mixture, and hath poured out; but the lees of it all the wicked of the earth shall suck out and drink (Psalms 75:8).

As the "meal-offering" and the "drink-offering," which were bread and wine, signify worship from the good of love and the truths of faith, so in a contrary sense, the "meal-offering" and "drink-offering" signify worship from the evils that are of the love of evil, and from the falsities of faith; this was signified by the "meal-offering" and "drink-offering" that were offered to idols and to the gods (Isaiah 57:6; 65:11; Jeremiah 7:18; 44:17-19; Ezekiel 20:28; Deuteronomy 32:38). From the signification of "wine" it can be seen what "vineyard," "vine," its "branches," and "grapes" signify in the Word, namely, that "a vineyard" signifies the spiritual church, that is, the church that is in the truths and goods of doctrine from the Lord, "a vine" the doctrine itself, its "branches" truths from which doctrine is formed, and "the grapes" which are the fruit of vineyards and of vines, the goods of charity and the goods of faith (but of these elsewhere).

Poznámky pod čarou: